People Respond With Different Moral Emotions to Violations in Different Relational Models: A Cross-Cultural Comparison

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKoc, Yasin/0000-0002-6727-3842|Hill, Charles T./0000-0002-1986-8163|PIYALE, ZEYNEP ECEM/0000-0002-0871-5751|Tepe, Beyza/0000-0003-0246-4995
dc.authorwosidKoc, Yasin/Y-4811-2019
dc.contributor.authorSunar, Diane
dc.contributor.authorCesur, Sevim
dc.contributor.authorPiyale, Zeynep Ecem
dc.contributor.authorTepe, Beyza
dc.contributor.authorBiten, Ali Furkan
dc.contributor.authorHill, Charles T.
dc.contributor.authorKoc, Yasin
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:56:56Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:56:56Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractConsonant with a functional view of moral emotions, we argue that morality is best analyzed within relationships rather than in individuals, and use Fiske's (1992) theory of relational models (RMs: communal sharing [CS], authority ranking [AR]. equality matching [EM], and market pricing [MP]) to predict that violations in different RMs will arouse different intensities of other-blaming emotions (anger, contempt and disgust) in both observers and victims, together with different intensities of self-blaming emotions (shame and guilt) in perpetrators, and to predict that these patterns of emotion will show similarity across both individuals and cultures. Three studies, using vignettes portraying moral violations in all RMs in different experimental designs. supported these expectations. while also producing some unexpected results. The intensity of shame and guilt varied markedly across RMs, but with little difference between the two emotions. The intensity of all 3 other-blaming emotions also varied across RMs. Anger was the most intense emotional response to violation in all RMs, whereas disgust and contempt were stronger in CS than in other RMs. Disgust and shame were linked more strongly in CS than in other RMs, and anger and guilt were more strongly linked than other emotion pairs in EM. Moral emotions in RMs involving hierarchy (AR and MP) differed widely depending on the perpetrator's dominant or subordinate status. Both Turkish (TR) and English-speaking (EN) samples showed similar patterns of all moral emotions across RMs. Understanding the functions of moral emotions in relationships using relational models can help to clarify multiple aspects of moral psychology.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/emo0000736
dc.identifier.endpage706en_US
dc.identifier.issn1528-3542
dc.identifier.issn1931-1516
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32191085en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85082658263en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage693en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000736
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/8914
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000685210300001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmer Psychological Assocen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEmotionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectCulture And Moralityen_US
dc.subjectMoral Emotionsen_US
dc.subjectMoral Judgmenten_US
dc.subjectRelational Modelsen_US
dc.subjectSocial Hierarchyen_US
dc.subjectDisgusten_US
dc.subjectAngeren_US
dc.subjectTransgressionsen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionen_US
dc.subjectCaden_US
dc.titlePeople Respond With Different Moral Emotions to Violations in Different Relational Models: A Cross-Cultural Comparison
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Web of Science Indexed Publications
PubMed Indexed Publications
Scopus Indexed Publications