Karachay-Balkar relative clauses: Implications for a special type of genitive/nominative alternation

dc.authoridGürer, Aslı/0000-0002-2196-7128
dc.authorwosidGürer, Aslı/AAA-4162-2022
dc.contributor.authorGurer, Asli
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:58:30Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:58:30Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractTaking reduced relative clauses as the basis of comparison, this study investigates Karachay-Balkar non-subject relative clauses with two different patterns. The subject in the modifier clause can bear the genitive case in the presence of agreement morphology on the head noun, or the nominative case in the absence of agreement morphology. Based on binding and adverbial placement tests, the current study suggests that (i) Karachay-Balkar relative clause patterns with genitive or nominative subjects are deficient in the absence of CP and TP; (ii) in the absence of TP, temporal interpretation is a secondary effect of AspP; (iii) the genitive subject moves into the DP domain to check the definiteness feature; (iv) the genitive pattern is preferred when the referents of the genitive construction and the head noun are shared by the speaker and the hearer; and (v) in the absence of the definiteness feature and CP/TP, the nominative case is licensed as the default case. This study shows that Karachay-Balkar relative clauses are reduced with respect to the absence of CP/TP. However, the size of the structure does not differ in genitive and nominative patterns, and the patterns are not in free variation as a syntax-semantic interface is at play. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [116K692]; TUBITAK; Istanbul Bilgi Universityen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (Project No. #116K692). We would like to thank TUBITAK and Istanbul Bilgi University for their support. We are grateful to Alan Karaketov, Asuman Tavlan, Aytek Yapici, Emine Dombayci Yalcin, Gulser Kiyak, Sefer Solmaz, Talha Bagci, Tokay Delibay and many other Karachay-Balkar native speakers for their native judgments. We would also like to thank Zeynep Schneider for her insightful comments on a preliminary version of the paper. Any errors are, of course, the author's.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102875
dc.identifier.issn0024-3841
dc.identifier.issn1872-6135
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85087013427en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102875
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/8990
dc.identifier.volume243en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000551878100003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofLinguaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectReduced Relative Clauseen_US
dc.subjectGenitive Subjecten_US
dc.subjectNominative Subjecten_US
dc.subjectDefinitenessen_US
dc.subjectNominalizationsen_US
dc.subjectConversionen_US
dc.titleKarachay-Balkar relative clauses: Implications for a special type of genitive/nominative alternationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar