Dynamic Relations Between Mentalization Techniques and Therapeutic Alliance in Psychodynamic Child Therapy: An Evidence-Based Case Study

dc.authoridGUVENC, DILARA/0000-0003-2031-7630
dc.contributor.authorGuvenc, Dilara
dc.contributor.authorHalfon, Sibel
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:56:57Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:56:57Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractTherapeutic alliance and mentalization are common factors inherent to all effective treatments. Mentalization-based interventions have the potential to create a safe relationship, which makes further mentalizing interventions possible. However, to date, no study has examined the bidirectional relationship between these variables in child psychotherapy. In an evidence-based case study design, psychodynamic therapy processes of two Turkish children (age: 9 and 10 years) who presented with social withdrawal problems were compared. All their sessions (34 sessions from Case No. 1 and 31 from Case No. 2) were coded using the Therapy Process Observational Coding System-Alliance Scale and Mentalization-Based Treatment for Children Adherence Scale. Outcome scales pertaining to symptoms, attachment, and mentalization were administered at baseline and at termination. Time-series Granger Causality tests revealed that in the case with clinically significant outcome, mentalization techniques predicted therapeutic alliance in the subsequent sessions, which predicted the use of further mentalization interventions. However, this relationship was not supported in the case with no significant improvement. Selected sessions were clinically analyzed with verbatim session vignettes. Our findings indicate that mentalization techniques in child therapy are closely related to the therapeutic relationship.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [215 K 180]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe data collection in this project was partially supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey Project No: 215 K 180. The authors would like to thank Istanbul Bilgi University for providing proofreading services.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/pst0000505
dc.identifier.endpage559en_US
dc.identifier.issn0033-3204
dc.identifier.issn1939-1536
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37856405en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85185180646en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage548en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1037/pst0000505
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/8922
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001108477900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmer Psychological Assoc, Div Psychotherapyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPsychotherapyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMentalizationen_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic Allianceen_US
dc.subjectPsychodynamic Child Therapyen_US
dc.subjectProcess Researchen_US
dc.subjectMental State Talken_US
dc.subjectTime-Seriesen_US
dc.subjectPsychotherapyen_US
dc.subjectPredictionen_US
dc.subjectScaleen_US
dc.titleDynamic Relations Between Mentalization Techniques and Therapeutic Alliance in Psychodynamic Child Therapy: An Evidence-Based Case Study
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar