Evaluation on Whether the Blockage of Pledged Receivables Credited to the Concordat Debtor's Bank Account Can Be Lifted by a Court Decision under Art.287 DEBL

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorTaskin, Zeynep Damla
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-04T18:56:05Z
dc.date.available2026-04-04T18:56:05Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAs per Art.285 of the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Law, any debtor who fails to perform his or her due obligations or who is under such a threat may request concordat to perform his or her obligations by way of postponement and/or reduction; or to avoid a possible bankruptcy situation. The court would then grant a provisional period and be entitled to take the conservatory measures necessary to preserve the debtor's assets (Art 285 DEBL). Although the lawmaker has abstained from listing possible measures, unblocking a blocked bank account is frequently requested in practise. If accepted, the debtor would clearly benefit from this measure. The debtor, who has already had a hard time performing his/her duties, may not overcome this financial setback without access to his/her account. However, debtors are not the only people affected by such a measure. The bank, which blocks the debtor's account, usually intends to preserve the receivable credited to that account so that it can enjoy its pledge on that receivable in case the debtor fails to fulfil its obligations. The severity of consequences that the pledgee will have to bear if the blockage is lifted is self-explanatory. Nevertheless, no unanimous opinion has been reached on whether the courts may grant this measure relying on Art.287 DEBL. The contradictory court rulings also prove this. This article aims to discuss whether Art. 287 DEBL could be the legal basis for such measures by focusing on the legal grounds presented in rulings where they are sought.
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/mecmua.2024.82.3.0002
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/mecmua.2024.82.3.0002
dc.identifier.issn2636-7734
dc.identifier.issn2667-6974
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.trdizinid1280755
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/mecmua.2024.82.3.0002
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1280755
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/10674
dc.identifier.volume82
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001329133400007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizin
dc.language.isotr
dc.publisherIstanbul Univ, Fac Law
dc.relation.ispartofIstanbul Hukuk Mecmuasi
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260402
dc.subjectReceivables Credited To The Bank Account
dc.subjectConservatory Measures
dc.subjectPledge On Future Receivables
dc.subjectCollateralization Of Future Receivables
dc.subjectRelative Invalidity
dc.titleEvaluation on Whether the Blockage of Pledged Receivables Credited to the Concordat Debtor's Bank Account Can Be Lifted by a Court Decision under Art.287 DEBL
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Web of Science Indexed Publications
TR Dizin Indexed Publications